Taylor v. Town of Hertford
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinboRNe, C. J.
In sustaining the motion to nonsuit, the court apparently relied on G.S. 136-41.1; G.S. 136-93 and G.S. 160-54. The record shows that counsel for defendant in making motion for judgment as of nonsuit called primarily to the Judge’s attention three statutes which defendant contends either separately or in combination one with the other absolutely control the question, and basically are the premise that the control and the right to control the area under consideration was not that of the Town of Hertford but it was that of the State Highway Commission, or in any event, some person or some…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mack v. . Marshall Field Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Pickett v. Carolina & Northwestern RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Jones v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
3Cited by8 opinions
- Matternes v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Shapiro v. Toyota Motor Co. Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- MILNER HOTELS, INCORPORATED v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Bowman v. Town of Granite FallsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Gibson v. BolchNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.