Legal Opinion

Moore v. Tristar Oil and Gas Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 25, 1981No. 80 Civ. 3383 (JMC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANNELLA, District Judge:

After a trial on the merits of plaintiffs’ amended complaint, the Court finds for defendants. The amended complaint is dismissed.

The Court reserves decision on defendants’ counterclaim 1 pending further proceedings consistent with this Opinion.

FACTS

Background

Plaintiffs bring this diversity action for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty against Tristar Oil and Gas Corp. [“Tristar”] and Bryant Petroleum Corp. [“Bryant”], 2 the two former general partners of the Tristar Thermoil Oil Income Program [the “partnership”], a California limited partnership,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Dabney-Johnston Oil Corp. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. La Laguna Ranch Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Laux v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Liona Corp. v. PCH Associates (In Re PCH Associates)District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. Grandbouche v. AdamsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1982
  3. Sitts v. Dairy Farmers of America, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API