Moore v. Tristar Oil and Gas Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANNELLA, District Judge:
After a trial on the merits of plaintiffs’ amended complaint, the Court finds for defendants. The amended complaint is dismissed.
The Court reserves decision on defendants’ counterclaim 1 pending further proceedings consistent with this Opinion.
FACTS
Background
Plaintiffs bring this diversity action for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty against Tristar Oil and Gas Corp. [“Tristar”] and Bryant Petroleum Corp. [“Bryant”], 2 the two former general partners of the Tristar Thermoil Oil Income Program [the “partnership”], a California limited partnership,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Dabney-Johnston Oil Corp. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- La Laguna Ranch Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Laux v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Liona Corp. v. PCH Associates (In Re PCH Associates)District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Grandbouche v. AdamsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1982
- Sitts v. Dairy Farmers of America, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2020