Legal Opinion

Sunrise Financial, Inc. v. PaineWebber, Inc.

District Court, D. Utah

Decided December 11, 1996No. 1:96-cv-00060PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SAM, District Judge.

The defendants Pasquale A. Basile and PaineWebber, Inc., filed motions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(7) to dismiss for failure to state a claim and failure to-join necessary parties. The plaintiffs submitted two affidavits in response, which PaineWebber moved to strike. For reasons set forth more fully below, the court grants in part and denies in part the motion to strike and denies the motions to dismiss. 1

I. Background

The plaintiffs are Sunrise Financial, Inc., a Utah corporation, and UTCO Associates, Ltd., a Utah limited partnership. According to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Allred v. HinkleyUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  4. De Wit v. Firstar Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
  5. Lige Estes v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rojas v. Loewen Group International, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1998
  2. Colon v. BladesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008
  3. Swartz v. BeachDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2002
  4. United States ex rel. Erickson v. Uintah Special Services DistrictDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2005
  5. United States v. AshbaughDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API