In Re SEALED MOTION
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Independent Counsel moves the court to reconsider its Order to release to a witness the transcript of his testimony as a witness before the grand jury in this proceeding under the Ethics in Government Act. 1 Movant (Independent Counsel) contends that the rule applicable to ordinary criminal proceedings applies to the instant case. However, such contention does not give adequate consideration to the sui gen-eris nature of the Independent Counsel Act and its specific provisions. We therefore hold that as a grand jury “witness” in an independent counsel proceeding, said witness is entitled to a…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In Re Theodore B. OLSONCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- In Re Oliver L. North (Omnibus Order)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re: Madison Guaranty Savings & LoanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- In Re Grand JurySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.