Legal Opinion
Armour and Company, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. Inver Grove Heights, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 6, 1993No. 92-2801PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appellant Armour and Company, Inc. (Armour) owns 32 acres of undeveloped land in the city of Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota (the city). This 32-aere tract of land is part of a larger 300-acre tract known as the southeast quadrant in Inver Grove Heights. As early as 1986, proposals had been made for development of the area as a discount shopping mall. The city actively and publicly pursued this proposal. The Armour tract of land has increased in value over the years as adjacent tracts have enjoyed public improvements, including the construction of interstate highways.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Gary Lefkowitz v. Citi-Equity Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Woods v. WillsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2005
- Shirrell v. Saint Francis Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014
- Citimortgage, Inc. v. Chicago Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Outdoor Graphics, Inc. v. City Of BurlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.