Legal Opinion

State v. Clifford

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1994No. 21142PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BACA, Justice.

Defendants’ motions for rehearing to consider whether Defendants’ racketeering convictions should be reversed was considered but not granted. We withdraw our opinion filed March 8,1994 and substitute the following after reviewing Defendants’ motions for rehearing and the State’s reply.

Defendants Jack M. Clifford and Jack J. Clifford appeal their convictions on twelve counts of embezzlement, one count of fraud, and one count of racketeering. Pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 34-5-14(0 (Repl.Pamp.1990), we accepted certification from the Court of Appeals to address one issue:…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. SutphinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. OsborneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. OroscoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. IsiahNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. State v. CunninghamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. WoodwardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Elane Photography, LLC v. WillockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. BarreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Kennedy v. Dexter Consolidated SchoolsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API