Legal Opinion
Lesher v. Law Offices of Mitchell N. Kay, PC
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 21, 2011No. 10-3194PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COWEN, Circuit Judge.
Darwin Lesher filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania alleging that debt-collection letters he received from the Law Offices of Mitchell N. Kay (the “Kay Law Firm”) were deceptive under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (the “FDCPA” or the “Act”). The District *995Court agreed and granted Lesher’s motion for summary judgment. The Kay Law Firm now appeals from the District Court’s order. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm.
I. Background
The Kay Law Firm is a law firm that acts as a debt collector. On…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gonzalez v. KayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Christ Clomon v. Philip D. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- EBC, Inc. v. Clark Building System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Rosenau v. Unifund Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Michelle Tatis v. Allied Interstate LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Courtney Douglass v. Convergent OutsourcingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Gager v. Dell Financial Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Simon v. FIA Card Services, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- David Tourgeman v. Collins Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.