Legal Opinion
Gonzalez v. Kay
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 3, 2009No. 08-20544PublishedCited by 540 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRADO, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Jose Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”) allegedly failed to pay his Sprint PCS Wireless cell phone bills, totaling $448.97. Sprint turned the consumer debt over to U.S. Asset Management Services, Inc. (“US Asset”), which in turn used the services of Defendants-Appellees Mitchell N. Kay (“Kay”) and the Law Offices of Mitchell N. Kay, P.C. (“the Kay Law Firm”) to collect the debt. The Kay Law Firm sent a collection letter to Gonzalez, which Gonzalez asserts violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA” or the “Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692e. The district court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Dorsey v. Portfolio Equities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Christ Clomon v. Philip D. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Rosenau v. Unifund Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by540 opinions
- RANDALL D. WOLCOTT, MD, PA v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Diane Russell v. Absolute Collection ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Sullivan v. Leor Energy, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Gonzales v. Arrow Financial Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Royce McLin v. Jason ArdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
535 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.