Legal Opinion

Matharu v. Muir

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 2011PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MUSMANNO, J.:

Scott D. Muir, D.O. (“Dr. Muir”), Fiori-na Pellegrino, D.O. (“Dr. Pellegrino”), Ha-zleton Women’s Care Center (“Hazleton”) and Muir OB/GYN Associates, P.C. (“Muir Associates”) (collectively, “Defendants”) appeal from the Order denying, in part, their Motion for the entry of summary judgment against Baljinder S. Matharu (“Father”) and Jessica A. Matharu (“Mother”), individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Milan Singh Matharu *378(“Child”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). We affirm.

The trial court set forth the undisputed facts underlying the instant appeal as follows:

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Summers v. CERTAINTEED CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Althaus Ex Rel. Althaus v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Atcovitz v. Gulph Mills Tennis Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. R.W. v. ManzekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pisano v. Extendicare Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Newell v. Montana West, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Matharu v. MuirSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Osborne v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Massey v. Fair Acres Geriatric CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API