Legal Opinion

Crook v. Schumann

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 24, 1942PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner- — ■

Affirming in part and reversing in part.

This record is a veritable labyrinth of pleadings, affidavits and orders, and the discursive briefs on both •sides contain so much extraneous and irrelevant matter that it has been extremely difficult to spot and “keep an ■eye on the squirrel. ’ ’ The final judgments appealed are: (1) The imposition of a fine of $25.00 upon each of two appellants for contempt of court in refusing to give depositions as on cross examination, and (2) another similar fine with the striking of all the defendants’ pleadings…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re WoolleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875
  2. Rudd v. RuddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Roper v. RoperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Arnold v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882
  5. Riley v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Young v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
  2. Arnett v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  3. Akers v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  4. Smith v. City of LoyallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
  5. Kindt v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API