Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Loyall

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 17, 1986PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWERTON, Judge.

The Smiths appeal from an order of the Harlan Circuit Court denying their motion to require the appellees to show cause why they should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with the provisions of an agreed order. The trial court found that the appellees had purged themselves of contempt by complying with the order prior to the hearing on the motion. The purpose of civil contempt authority is to provide courts with a means for enforcing their judgments and orders, and trial courts have almost unlimited discretion in applying this power. We find no error in the denial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crook v. SchumannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  2. Tucker v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Meyers v. PetrieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2007
  2. Cary v. Pulaski County Fiscal CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013
  3. Rearden v. ReardenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
  4. Crowder v. ReardenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
  5. Kentucky Retirement Systems v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API