Legal Opinion

Matter of Shillitani v. Valentine

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1947PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Since the record justifies the conclusion that petitioner was engaged in conduct violative of section 986 of the Penal Law, it follows that he failed to establish — in this proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act — a clear legal right to the relief sought. Under the circumstances of this case, there was no warrant for compelling the telephone company to reinstate its service for petitioner.

In our view, however — though the Police Commissioner may have a deep and real interest in law enforcement — neither he nor any other law enforcement agent may, by reason thereof, be regarded…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pike v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Figari v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  3. People v. SteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  4. Rubin v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Rosner v. New York Telephone Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API