Legal Opinion

People v. Stein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 6, 1952PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.

Twenty-one individuals invested money with defendants and became shareholders in a pool designated “ Seniors Defendant Walter Stein believed that he had devised a handicapping system, which, if used as a basis for daily bets on horse races, would procure sure winnings for the participants. Of the persons intrigued by defendants’ get rich quick system, some were close relatives, others were clients of defendant Walter Stein’s accounting firm, and still others were neighbors or friends.

Wagers were made from day to day by the three defendants on a large number of horses running in separate races…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. . StedekerNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. People v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Bamman v. EricksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Matter of Shillitani v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Shillitani v. ValentineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Maurer v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. People v. De Sisto, New York County Courts1961
  3. Cohen v. IuzziniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  4. Liss v. ManuelCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
  5. People ex rel. Wasmund v. Wallack, New York County Courts1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API