Legal Opinion
Rosner v. New York Telephone Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 31, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHenry Clay Greenberg, J.
This is an application for an order directing that the New York Telephone Company restore telephone service. The proceeding as against the Police Commissioner of the City of New York has been withdrawn.
On March 26, 1960, telephone service previously supplied at the corporate petitioner’s place of business consisting of three separate lines was terminated after a police raid and arrest of three men with criminal records. The charge against these men of operating a wire room for illegal gambling was dismissed in the Magistrate’s Court. The individual petitioner, the true owner of the business,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schindler v. Royal Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Matter of Leitner v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Matter of Shillitani v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Shillitani v. ValentineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lopez v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- In Re Delaware Sports ServiceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963
- Rubin v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962