Legal Opinion

Barcena v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1984No. 9089, 9005PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

The dispositive question in these consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit is whether Ann Marie Barcena, formerly Ann Marie Lewis, who was insured under a “no-fault policy” that apparently provided no payments to defray expenses incurred for physical therapy because she was a recipient of public assistance when the auto accident causing her harm occurred, was nonetheless entitled to the “no-fault benefits” designed to cover such expenditures when she became ineligible for public assistance thereafter.

While a literal application of a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1908
  2. Van Beeck v. Sabine Towing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Keller v. ThompsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Montalvo v. ChangHawaii Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'i v. LawrenceHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Washington v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Doi v. Hawaiian Ins. & Guar. Co., Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Rana v. Bishop Ins. of Hawaii, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. In Re the Claim of MaldonadoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API