Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re the Claim of Maldonado

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1984No. 9323; CIVIL NO. 71476PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

TANAKA, J.

Claimant Ruperto Maldonado (Maldonado) appeals the circuit court judgment affirming the Insurance Commissioner’s (Com missioner) denial of his no-fault wage loss benefit claim against Transport Indemnity (Indemnity). The Commissioner had ruled that since Maldonado was receiving total monthly workers’ compensation income benefits 1 which exceeded the basic statutory no-fault monthly wage loss benefits limit, he was ineligible for any no-fault monthly wage loss benefits 2 under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 294-5(b) (1976, as amended).

The issue on appeal is…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Waikiki Resort Hotel, Inc. v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Pacific Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Oregon Auto. Ins. Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. KaneakuaHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Smelser v. Criterion InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Seely v. Oklahoma Horse Racing CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Rana v. Bishop Ins. of Hawaii, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Chun v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. National Union Fire Insurance v. VillanuevaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1989
  5. In Re Claim of MaldonadoHawaii Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API