Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Board of Administration
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 20, 1980No. Civ. 46409PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINBERG, J.
I
The facts here are undisputed. Respondent Board of Administration (Board) of the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) provides retirement benefits to Santa Clara County employees on a contract basis. County employees covered by PERS have been generally divided into two categories, local safety members and local miscellaneous members. The safety members are engaged in the more hazardous occupations, such as fire fighting and law enforcement. The remainder of the Santa Clara County employees fall into the miscellaneous category. The retirement benefits for the safety…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Estate of BanerjeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- City of National City v. FritzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Goins v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Cavitt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- City of Fremont v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Barth v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Button v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Rodie v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.