Legal Opinion
Cavitt v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 6, 1967No. Civ. 30441PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoth, P. J.
The City of Los Angeles appeals from a judgment declaring that Edith D. Cavitt is entitled to receive, pursuant to section 183% of the Los Angeles City Charter, from the city’s Fire and Police Pension Fund, a fixed monthly pension of $310.40 for the remainder of her natural life or until remarriage, and awarding her pension benefits of $2,926.89 including interest, accrued to date of judgment.
The facts are undisputed. On August 25, 1920, Edith married Clyde D. Cavitt. On March 1, 1930, Clyde became a member of the Los Angeles Police Department, a position he held continuously until February…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- French v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Terry v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Gibson v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Noroian v. Department of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Goins v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Campbell v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- In Re Marriage of WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Lyons v. State of New Jersey, Department of the TreasuryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.