Legal Opinion

Roxco, Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 20, 2007No. 02-176CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge.

Before the court is defendant’s Motion for Partial Dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims. Plaintiff contractor filed suit in this court appealing the contracting officer’s rejection of its claim for an equitable adjustment on its construction contract with the United States Department of the Air Force. Plaintiff later amended its Complaint, seeking, inter alia, the contract balance. Defendant seeks dismissal of that *139portion of plaintiffs Amended Complaint1 requesting the outstanding contract balance. For…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. M. Maropakis Carpentry, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Northrop Grumman Computing Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Bruhn Newtech, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Hanover Insurance Company (The) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API