Legal Opinion
Hanover Insurance Company (The) v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 27, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00500PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge
These three consolidated cases concern a construction contract between the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) and Lodge Construction, Inc. (“Lodge”). In the complaint filed in the lead ease, Lodge’s surety, The Hanover Insurance Company (“Hanover”), contends that the Corps improperly terminated its contract with Lodge for default. Lodge makes this same contention in its first complaint (“Lodge I”), and then contends in its second complaint (“Lodge II”) that the Corps should not have denied three of its requests for contract adjustments. Defendant…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Reflectone, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hanover Insurance Company (The) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Groundbreaker Development Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
- Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019