Sigvertsen v. Maney Bros. Mill & Elevator Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Defendant appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for jiidgment non obstante or a new trial.
Plaintiff’s employment by defendant as a flour salesman is admitted. The controversy is as to whether he was to have a bonus or commission on the profits or income in addition to his monthly salary, automobile, and trade expense allowance. He prosecutes this action to collect alleged commissions. He States three causes of action, stating each year separately from June 30, beginning With June 30, 1925. Plaintiff’s verdict for $3,097.78 was reduced to $2,895.33 by the court because of an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- State v. CotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Moquin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Christopherson v. Custom Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. GearySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Jovaag v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Ryan v. City of CrookstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Thompson v. CroffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Pettersen v. FosseenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935