Christopherson v. Custom Laundry Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Olsen, C.
Defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, if that be denied, then for a new trial.
The action is one to recover damages for personal injuries, and plaintiff recovered a verdict. The appeal presents the. usual two questions: (1) whether the evidence justifies the verdict; (2) whether there were reversible errors on the trial, excepted to and assigned as errors by the defendant so as to be available here.
Plaintiff’s cause of action is- based upon defendant’s failure to keep a toilet in its laundry in proper condition, as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Schaar v. ConforthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Farrell v. G. O. Miller Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Hillstrom v. Mannheimer Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Frederick v. McRaeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Morris v. Dame'sSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
- Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Larson v. MontpetitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Kramer v. KramerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Moquin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.