Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Croff

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 1931No. 28,264PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, O. J.

Plaintiff appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The action is for the specific performance of an alleged contract for deed. Plaintiff attacks a finding of the trial court to the effect that the alleged contract was incomplete and therefore unenforceable. This and numerous other assignments of error are not here considered since they avail plaintiff nothing because of either of two other findings of the trial court which are sustained by the evidence. One of these findings is that the plaintiff procured the contract by fraud; the other is that plaintiff is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sigvertsen v. Maney Bros. Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fred O. Watson Co. v. United States Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Taylor v. Santa Fe Northwestern Ry. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API