Jovaag v. O'Donnell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 249 N.W. 676. Marguerite Jovaag and her husband, Burnett, brought these actions to recover for her personal injuries and the loss of her services arising out of an automobile collision. The wife recovered a verdict for $1,500 and the husband for $350. The defendant has appealed in each case from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff after a denial of the defendant's motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. The appeals bring here the questions of misconduct of plaintiffs' counsel and whether or not the plaintiff Marguerite Jovaag, who was driving…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Olson v. Purity Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- State v. CotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Moquin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Darling v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. WoelfleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Eilola v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- State v. DeSchepperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Bartl v. City of New UlmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Rian v. HegnauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.