Disciplinary Counsel v. Kurtz

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 55.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. KURTZ. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Kurtz,

1998-Ohio-278.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Misappropriation of client funds—Engaging in self-dealing and violating fiduciary duty as a trustee. (No. 97-2182—Submitted February 17, 1998—Decided May 20, 1998.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 95-41. __________________ {¶ 1} On June 5, 1995, relator, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, filed a…