Schiff v. Schiff
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Cross appeals from an order granting in part and denying in part plaintiff’s motion to strike out the six defenses in defendant’s answer as insufficient in law, and denying defendant’s cross motion for judgment on the *846pleadings. Order modified on the law by striking from the first ordering paragraph the word “ Sixth ” and inserting the words “ First ” and “ Fifth ”. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. The first defense, alleging that plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law, is a mere conclusion o£ law with no facts alleged to support it. (McKenzie v. Wappler Electric Go.,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tirrell v. . TirrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Central New York Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. AverillNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Dworkin v. DworkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Scheinberg v. ScheinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Levan v. American Safety Table Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ferro v. BolognaNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Bruno v. BrunoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Hummel v. HummelNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Stahl v. StahlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Henderson v. HendersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.