Legal Opinion

Bruno v. Bruno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 20, 1976PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified, on the facts, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from so much of á judgment in a divorce action as directs him to pay alimony to the plaintiff in the sum of $200 per week and all of plaintiff’s medical, dental and hospital expenses. After a 20-year marriage the parties executed a separation agreement in October, 1973 whereby plaintiff received slightly less than $14,000 as her equal share of joint bank accounts, and an automobile valued at $3,700. The agreement contained a nonmerger clause regarding any future divorce suit,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haas v. HaasNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Kyff v. KyffNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Schiff v. SchiffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  4. Henderson v. HendersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Patton v. PattonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Christian v. ChristianNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Muscarella v. MuscarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Colabella v. ColabellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Taft v. TaftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Flanter v. FlanterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API