Legal Opinion
Ferro v. Bologna
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 8, 1972PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
The appeal involves the rights, of third-party beneficiaries of a separation agreement which has correctly been found invalid with respect to certain support provisions.
Plaintiffs Comparetto and Popkin sue for the proceeds of certain insurance upon the life of their deceased father, claiming under a provision of their parents’ 1958 separation agreement stipulating that the husband would continue in force certain group life insurance and, further, ‘ ‘ that the Husband may make a beneficiary change, removing the Wife as beneficiary on the said group life insurance policy and making the children…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Central New York Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. AverillNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Hoops v. HoopsNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Schiff v. SchiffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Dworkin v. DworkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Hoops v. HoopsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Simonds v. SimondsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Beth Israel Medical Center v. Horizon Blue Cross & Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Beth Israel Medical Center v. Horizon Blue Cross And Blue Shield Of New Jersey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Avitzur v. AvitzurNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Martin v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.