Hummel v. Hummel
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
(I)
Initially, the complaint set forth but one cause of action — that for a divorce by the plaintiff wife. It was grounded upon the recently enacted section 170 (subd. [6]) .of the Domestic Relations Law, which provides that such an action may be maintained when ‘ ‘ The husband and wife have lived separate and apart pursuant to a written agreement of separation * * * for a period of two years after the execution of such agreement and satisfactory proof has been submitted by the plaintiff that he or she substantially performed all the terms and conditions of such agreement.”
The complaint…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Winter v. . WinterNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Garlock v. GarlockNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Tirrell v. . TirrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Kirkbride v. Van NoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Haas v. HaasNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Christian v. ChristianNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Infanto v. InfantoNew York Family Court · 1971
- Seligman v. SeligmanNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Filstein v. BrombergNew York Supreme Court · 2012
- Cooper v. CastagnelloNew York Supreme Court · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.