Legal Opinion
Aref v. Holder
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 30, 2011No. Civil Action 10-0539 (RMU)PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; Granting the Defendants’ Supplemental Motion for Partial Dismissal; Denying the Applicants’ Motion to Intervene
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss and supplemental motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs are a group of federal prisoners who are or were incarcerated in specially designated Communication Management Units (“CMUs”) established at the Federal Correctional Institutions (“FCI”) in Terre Haute, Indiana (“Terre Haute…
2Cases cited100 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Yassin Aref v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Doe v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Clayton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Beg Investments, LLC v. AlbertiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Shinabargar v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.