Legal Opinion

Doe v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 11, 2015No. 13-7140PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge WILKINS.

*100RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judge:

The District of Columbia’s Child and Family Services Agency temporarily removed two adopted children from their home. These two children and another child living there had endured sexual abuse for years. The children resided with their parents, Robert and Carla Doe. After the government acted, the Does brought a multi-count complaint seeking damages from the District of Columbia, the Family Services Agency, and District employees. The district judge,…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Martin Scahill & HRH Servs. LLC v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Hargraves v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Burton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. Alexander Khochinsky v. Republic of PolandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
  5. Corrigan v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API