Triple E Produce Corp. v. Valencia

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the sum of $1,519,865.33 against the garnishee, entered after a trial by the court. The garnishee, Edgar Valencia, dba Engebret-son-Grupe Co. (Valencia), contends the trial court erred because the renewal judgment which formed the basis of the garnishment action was void and because Valencia was not indebted to the judgment debtor. We do not agree and affirm.

I

The defendants in the original breach of contract action included Ramiro Castro Soto, a farmer growing produce in Gua-save, Mexico, and other members of his family. They shall be…