Legal Opinion
Bata Shoe Co. v. Hijos
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 28, 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.
The defendant is a Spanish corporation which sells its product in the United States, but has no offices in New York and is not authorized to do business in New York. In an action for money damages because of defendant’s failure to deliver certain goods, and in which service could not be effected on the defendant in Spain, plaintiff obtained an order of attachment authorizing the sheriff to levy upon any prop*134erty to the value of $36,900 in which the defendant had an interest and upon any debts owing to defendant. An order next was served upon William Iselin, a factor who was either sold or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- ABKCO Industries, Inc. v. Apple Films, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Sheehy v. Madison Square Garden Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Fitchburg Yarn Co. v. Wall & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Lutes v. ShenkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clarkson Co. Ltd. v. ShaheenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Triple E Produce Corp. v. ValenciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Posadas De Puerto Rico, Inc. v. GrubermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Morgenthow & Latham v. Bank of New York Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Feltman, not individually but solely in his capaci v. Tri-State Employment Service, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2022