Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Hudson River Stone Supply Co. v. Venable Const. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Decided June 3, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions
On Motion to Retax Costs.
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, District Judge.
On the motion to retax costs in this case, the first question is as to the taxation of the mileage of two witnesses, via., Brown, for two trips, and Kettle, for three trips. There is1 an agreement of facts by counsel as to this matter, as follows:
“There was an adjournment of the court for the holidays of two weeks, and in order that the court might be held at Columbus for one week, pending the trial of the cause. For this reason witness Brown has been allowed for two trips, and witness Kettle for three trips, each trip being taxed by the clerk at 100 miles each way. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barnardin v. NorthallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1897
- Indianapolis Water Co. v. American Straw-Board Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1895
- Switzer v. Home Ins. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Mississippi · 1891
3Cited by6 opinions
- Richards v. SilveriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Alaska S. S. Co. v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- Katz v. Cie Generale TransatlantiqueDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1960
- American Bank Protection Co. v. City Nat. Bank of JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1913
- Firemen's Fund Insurance v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.