Legal Opinion

Blondell v. Baltimore City Police Department

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 8, 1996No. 68PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

In this case, we are asked to interpret §§ 727, 733, and 734A of the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights (LEOBR), which govern punishment for violations of police regulations.1 The question presented is whether the LEOBR prohibits the Police Department from adding new charges against an officer after the officer rejects the Department’s initial offer of punishment. We shall hold that in this case, the Department’s decision to add a new charge did not violate the LEOBR.

I

In December, 1990, Captain Charles Blondell of the Baltimore City Police Department was accused of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. FabritzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Police Commissioner v. DowlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Government Employees Insurance v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Mustafa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. DiGrazia v. COUNTY EXEC. FOR MONT. CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Hamilton v. Mayor of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  3. Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Derry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Medex v. McCabeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API