Blondell v. Baltimore City Police Department
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
In this case, we are asked to interpret §§ 727, 733, and 734A of the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights (LEOBR), which govern punishment for violations of police regulations.1 The question presented is whether the LEOBR prohibits the Police Department from adding new charges against an officer after the officer rejects the Department’s initial offer of punishment. We shall hold that in this case, the Department’s decision to add a new charge did not violate the LEOBR.
I
In December, 1990, Captain Charles Blondell of the Baltimore City Police Department was accused of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. FabritzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Police Commissioner v. DowlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Government Employees Insurance v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Mustafa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- DiGrazia v. COUNTY EXEC. FOR MONT. CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Hamilton v. Mayor of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Derry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Medex v. McCabeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.