Legal Opinion

Schlesinger v. Quinto

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion for injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, J.

The plaintiffs move to continue pendente lite a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendants from combining and conspiring to order, direct, instigate, counsel, advise or encourage members of the defendant association to violate a certain agreement made between the association and plaintiffs’ union, and from doing any act in furtherance of such conspiracy.

The contract, the subject of this litigation, was entered into between the Cloak, Suit and Skirt Manufacturers Protective Association, acting on behalf of its members, employees, and the International Ladies’ *737Garment Workers Union and its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Grassi Contracting Co. v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. Beattie v. CallananAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lion Oil Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. Dubinsky v. Blue Dale Dress Co.New York Supreme Court · 1936
  3. A. H. Bull Steamship Co. v. National Marine Engineers' Beneficial Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1957
  4. Lion Oil Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API