Legal Opinion
Schenekl v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided August 12, 1999No. 2-98-386-CRPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAM BRIGHAM, Justice.
The trial court found appellant guilty of boating while intoxicated and sentenced him to 180 days’ confinement plus a $500 fine. In two points, he argues that the enforcement provision of the Water Safety Act (the Act) 1 violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and that he was denied a speedy trial. We affirm.
I. Background
Around midnight on September 3, 1995, Texas Game Warden Patrick C. Canan was patrolling Lake Lewisville in his marked state patrol boat. He saw appellant leaving Sneaky Pete’s Marina driving a 20 foot, 1993 Stingray.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Zamorano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Schenekl v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Marquez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
- Kelly v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
- State v. PikeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.