Legal Opinion

State v. Pike

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 18, 2000No. COA99-675PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

This case presents a question of first impression for North Carolina, that is, whether a Wildlife Resources Commission officer may stop to conduct a safety inspection of a motor vessel on the waters of North Carolina without having any reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity to justify the stop. Although we refuse to expand the ruling in this case to other factual situations, we hold that under these circumstances the stop was reasonable and therefore did not violate defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. Therefore, we reverse and remand.

The facts in this case are…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peruzzi v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. People v. ButoracAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  3. State v. CarrOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Com. of PA v. F.W. KarashCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API