Legal Opinion
Zamorano v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided September 11, 2002No. 1442-00PublishedCited by 463 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · CochranCochran, J.
in which MEYERS, PRICE, JOHNSON, and HOLCOMB, JJ„ joined.
Appellant was charged with Driving While Intoxicated (“DWI”) in October 1995, but his case was repeatedly reset and lingered on the docket for almost four years. Appellant twice filed speedy trial motions, which the trial court heard and denied. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s ruling.1 We granted review in this case to determine whether the court of appeals correctly applied the federal constitutional speedy trial factors set out in Barker v. Wingo.2 We conclude that, un*647der the applicable United States Supreme…
3Cases cited24 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by463 opinions
- Dragoo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Shaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Balderas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
458 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.