Legal Opinion

Tobias v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1894PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error to Ingham. (Person, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error.. The facts are stated in the majority opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

In October, 1891, the husband of the administratrix, while driving his horses and wagon on a public highway where it crosses the defendant’s tracks, was struck by one of defendant’s passenger trains and killed. The accident occurred at 5:30 o’clock in the evening at the place known as “ Mt. Hope Crossing,” in the south boundary of the city of Lansing. This action is for damages.

The negligence alleged is:

1. Running the train at a high rate of speed, the crossing being a dangerous one, and the night dark and foggy.

2. Failing to ring the bell as required by the statute.

3. That the defendant had,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richmond v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hagan v. Chicago, Detroit & Canada Grand Trunk Junction RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Maltby v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Klanowski v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Thayer v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kimball & Fink v. Friend's Adm' rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  2. Jacobs v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Mollica v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. DentySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  5. City of Independence v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1901

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API