Mudd v. State

Appellant Brian D. Mudd was convicted in a jury trial of felony theft by receiving, possession of methamphetamine, and possession of drug paraphernalia with the purpose to inject, ingest, or inhale methamphetamine.1 Mudd was sentenced as a habitual offender to three consecutive fifteen-year prison terms. Mudd now appeals, and his sole argument is that there was insufficient evidence to support the verdicts. We affirm.

The test for determining the sufficiency of the evidence is whether the verdict is supported by substantial evidence, direct or circumstantial. Bohanan v. State , 72 Ark. App.…