Legal Opinion

Breedlove v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 17, 1998No. CA CR 97-1053PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wendell L. Griffen, Judge.

Roy O. Breedlove has appealed from his conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree. For reversal, appellant argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion for a directed verdict and his motions for mistrial. We disagree and, therefore, affirm.

Breedlove was convicted of first-degree sexual abuse pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated § 5-14-108(a)(4) (Repl. 1997). At the close of the State’s evidence, Breedlove moved for a directed verdict on the ground that the State failed to prove that there was sexual gratification by sexual contact with the victim. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. King v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Kennedy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Whitlatch v. Southland Land & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Bohanan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Donovan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Ashlock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API