Legal Opinion

Bohanan v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 14, 2001No. CA CR 00-77PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN B. Robbins, Judge.

Appellant James M. Bohanan was convicted by a jury of driving while intoxicated. He was fined $500.00 and ordered to serve one day in jail, with credit for time served. Mr. Bohanan now appeals, arguing that his conviction is not supported by sufficient evidence. He also raises three eviden-tiary issues. We affirm.

When an appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, we review the sufficiency argument prior to a review of any alleged trial errors. Jenkins v. State, 60 Ark. App. 1, 959 S.W.2d 57 (1997). The test for determining the sufficiency of the evidence is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Meyer v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Frette v. City of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Greene v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Shelton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  2. Frazer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Morton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  4. McConnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Ashley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API