Legal Opinion

Black v. Perkins

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 19, 1989No. 2 CA-CV 89-0105PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVERMORE, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs Leonard and Jeanette Black executed a $42,500 promissory note, secured by a deed of trust on property owned by them, in favor of defendant Kenneth Perkins. They subsequently brought a quiet title action against Perkins claiming the note to be without consideration. Perkins defended by claiming that the note had adequate consideration because it secured a debt owed by Leonard Black’s business partner, Joe Guzman; Guzman and Black denied this. This lawsuit was dismissed for want of prosecution on November 17, 1987, and Perkins immediately bought the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heth v. Del Webb's Highway InnArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Starkovich v. NoyeArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Czarnecki v. CzarneckiArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Paul Schoonover, Inc. v. Ram Construction Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Fox v. WeissbachArizona Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roland v. BernsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. KCI Restaurant Management LLC v. Holm Wright Hyde & Hays PLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. Robertson v. AllingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API