Legal Opinion

Roland v. Bernstein

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 24, 1991No. 2 CA-CV 91-0086PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVERMORE, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff brought a medical malpractice complaint against Ronald Bernstein, a neurosurgeon, his professional corporation, Desert Neurosurgery, Joseph Marcinkowski, an anesthesiologist, and Tucson General Hospital. Tucson General and Marcinkowski settled the claim for $700,000 each and the case proceeded to trial against Bernstein and his corporation. The jury found plaintiff’s damages to be $1,965,000 and the degree of fault to be 47% for Bernstein, 28% for Marcinkowski, and 25% for Tucson General Hospital. The question then arose whether under A.R.S. § 12-2504…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Wilson v. GaltNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Charles v. Giant Eagle MarketsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Kussman v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. Thomas v. SolbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & SonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Wells v. Tallahassee Mem. Med. CenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. Haderlie v. SondgerothWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Petrolane Inc. v. RoblesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API