Legal Opinion

Ortega v. Veenstra

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1969No. Calendar 8, Docket 52,001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Plaintiff' appealed a jury verdict of no cause of action. The Court of Appeals affirmed 1 as to defendants Veenstra and reversed the trial court and granted a new trial against defendant Lenderink.

This opinion is confined to plaintiff’s appeal to this Court 2 from the affirmance of the verdict and judgment of no cause of action as to defendants Veenstra.

On August 28,1962, at about 11 a.m., as defendant Dona Veenstra was driving south on Clancy avenue, in the city of Grand Rapids, Robert Ortega (who was 7 years and 7 months old at the time of the accident) attempted to cross Clancy avenue from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelley v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Bartlett v. MelzoMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Knickerbocker v. SamsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Ortega v. LenderinkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ortega v. LenderinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Earls v. HerrickMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Hall v. WoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API