Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Melzo

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1958No. Docket 30, Calendar 47,098PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This case involves another pedestrián and another automobile. The pedestrian, Charles H. Bartlett, was 76 years of age. He was crossing Hess street (which runs east and west) at the Prescott street unmarked crosswalk in the city of Saginaw. He was under the dual protection of the Commandment, “Thou shalt not kill,” and such vestiges of section 169 of the ordinance of the city of Saginaw as remained effective after our decision in Moldenhauer v. Smith, 311 Mich 265.

Mr. Bartlett almost made it. His foot was on the curb when he was struck and killed. The automobile involved was driven by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Molda v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Petersen v. LundinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Patterson v. WagnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Moore v. NoorthoekMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Moldenhauer v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McKinney v. YelavichMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Gilson v. BronkhorstMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Ware v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Bonner v. AmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Knickerbocker v. SamsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API