Cincinnati Traction Bldg. Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
GIBSON, District Judge.
After decree in favor of defendant the plaintiff has objected to the taxation of its costs. The original bill of costs has been amended and as so amended is now under consideration.
No objection is urged to the first three items, viz.: costs awarded by the Circuit Court of Appeals, the fee of the Clerk of this court, and the attorney’s docket fee. Also, the amount paid the court reporter for transcribing notes of testimony having been reduced by the amended bill of costs, the original objection thereto has not been urged and will be formally overruled.
The taxation of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Primrose v. FennoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1902
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kenyon v. Automatic Instrument Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1950
- Gotz v. Universal Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
- Bennett Chemical Co. v. Atlantic Commodities, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Emerson v. National Cylinder Gas CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1957
- Eickhoff v. Vulcan Iron WorksDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.