Legal Opinion

Cooper v. City of Goodland

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1909No. 15,973PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Sherman district court; Charles W. Smith, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

The city of Goodland is a city of the second class and as such for some time previous to the commencement of this suit had owned, operated and maintained a system of water-works and had thereby supplied the inhabitants of the city with water. It seems that the city had been supplying water to the users thereof without any means of measuring the amounts used, and in January, 1908, the mayor and council of the city duly passed and published an ordinance pro*122viding, among other thing’s, that on and after April 1, 1908, no consumer of water from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spring Valley Water Works v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Miller v. TobinUnited States Circuit Court · 1883
  3. Albert v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dodd v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Mallon v. Board of Water CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Farkas v. City of AlbanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. City of Columbus v. American Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Vitacolonna v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API