Legal Opinion

Miller v. Tobin

United States Circuit Court

Decided December 10, 1883PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Suit to Compel a Patentee of Land to Convey the Same.

1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.

This is a motion to remand this canse to tbe state court. A brief statement of the pleadings and proceedings therein is necessary to a correct understanding of tbe points made by and on the argument of it.

On April 6, 1883, tbe plaintiff commenced suit in equity in the circuit court of the state for the county of Klamath, to compel the defendant to convey the legal title and deliver the possession to him of a certain tract of land containing 160.66 acres, and situate in said county, — the same being parts of sections 17, 18, and 19 of township 39 S., and of range 9 E. of tbe Wallamet meridian,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. KoontzSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Steamship Co. v. TugmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Kern v. HuidekoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Insurance Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Yulee v. VoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Grant v. MichaelsMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Brown v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. WJR, the Goodwill Station, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  4. State ex rel. Arnold v. Common CouncilWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. United States v. 72 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in City of OaklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API